<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>DIMENSIONS OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION IN THE ORGANISED PRIVATE SECTOR OF OYO STATE, NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1986</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 13:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T13:26:57Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>DIMENSIONS OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION IN THE ORGANISED PRIVATE SECTOR OF OYO STATE, NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1987</link>
<description>DIMENSIONS OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION IN THE ORGANISED PRIVATE SECTOR OF OYO STATE, NIGERIA
OGUNDIPE, Rukayat Oladayo
Employment Discrimination (ED), bias towards or against workers, is a common&#13;
phenomenon in organisations. Evidence has shown that the Organised Private Sector (OPS)&#13;
is bedevilled with ED in Oyo State which hinders institutionalisation of decent work.&#13;
Previous studies focused more on prevalence, predicting factors and social actors’ reactions&#13;
of ED than on its dimensions. This study, therefore, was carried out to investigate the&#13;
dimensions of ED in the OPS of Oyo State, Nigeria.&#13;
The Disparate Treatment and Impact Theory served as the anchor, while the study adopted&#13;
the survey design. Three sectors (agriculture, manufacturing and services) of the OPS in&#13;
Oyo State were enumerated, using disproportionate sampling technique. Five unionised&#13;
and accessible and one accessible but non-unionised organisation were selected: three from&#13;
manufacturing, one from agriculture and two from services. A total of 340 employees were&#13;
randomly selected across the six organisations with 24 trade union officials and 48 Labour&#13;
Inspectors (LIs). The instruments used were Employees ED (r=0.89) having eight subscales, Trade Union ED (r=0.93) having five sub-scales and Labour Official ED (r=0.77)&#13;
having two sub-scales questionnaires. In-depth and key informant interviews were held&#13;
with five labour leaders, two LI officials and three Labour Law Practitioners (LLPs),&#13;
respectively. Quantitative data were subjected to simple percentage and mean, while&#13;
qualitative data were thematically analysed.&#13;
Majority (99.8%) were males and had master degree (99.9%), with the mean age 45.5±8&#13;
years. Age based discrimination (42.7%) is the most prevalent ED followed by gender&#13;
(28.5%), religion (20.9%), while ethnicity is the least (12.6%). The EDs were not reported&#13;
due to culture of silence (21.5%), fear of repercussions (4.5%), ignorance (20.6%) and&#13;
seeking spiritual of supports (12.9%). Against the threshold of 2.5, ED engendered poor&#13;
job performance ( x =2.99), job-related stress ( x =2.99) and absenteeism ( x =2.96), and&#13;
had adverse effects on employees’ well-being ( x =2.96), job commitment ( x =2.91),&#13;
organisational image ( x =2.68) and profit margin ( x =2.63). Trade unions, unlike the&#13;
employees, were aware of provisions for redress, but were inattentive to EDs because&#13;
allegations were not properly substantiated. The LLPs were of the view that existing labour&#13;
statutes did not specifically address EDs due to non-availability of anti-discrimination&#13;
policy. The Ministry hardly received ED reports; and there were no funding for prosecuting&#13;
offenders.&#13;
The dimensions of employment discrimination in the Organised Private Sector of Oyo&#13;
State were along the lines of age, gender, religious and ethnic dimensions. These&#13;
dimensions of employment discrimination should be mitigated by trade unions and&#13;
officials of the Federal Ministry of Labour.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1987</guid>
<dc:date>2023-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
