<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>DETERMINANTS OF CITIZENS’ PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN OSUN STATE, NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2273</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 20:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-06T20:15:35Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>DETERMINANTS OF CITIZENS’ PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN OSUN STATE, NIGERIA</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2274</link>
<description>DETERMINANTS OF CITIZENS’ PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN OSUN STATE, NIGERIA
AMUSAN, Timothy Adewale
Community development is a global adopted concept for improving the quality of life of&#13;
residents in a locality. Several reports have identified education as the most important&#13;
component of this approach as it ensures learnipng to become responsible citizen members and&#13;
building strong society and emotional skills. However, reports have shown that citizens‘&#13;
mobilisation and engagement towards the development of their communities have been on the&#13;
decline in Osun State, Nigeria. Previous studies concentrated more on governmental, nongovernmental and international agencies‘ interventions which is more of top-down approach&#13;
than on Citizens‘ Participation (CP) that is bottom-top approach. This study, therefore, was&#13;
designed to examine the determinants of CP (leadership style, members‘ attitude to&#13;
community projects, educational background, gender-related cultural issues, socio-economic&#13;
status and projects‘ location) and Community Development Projects (CDPs) in Osun State,&#13;
Nigeria.&#13;
This study was anchored to the Ladder of CP Theory, while the mixed methods design was&#13;
adopted. Two Local Government Areas (LGAs) were randomly selected from each of the&#13;
existing senatorial districts, while 10 registered Community Development Associations&#13;
(CDAs) were purposively selected from each LGA. Two hundred CDA members were&#13;
randomly selected from the selected LGAs, totalling 1, 200 members. The instruments used&#13;
were CP (r=0.86), Leadership Style (r=0.75), Gender-related Cultural Issues (r=0.76), Attitude&#13;
to CDPs (r=0.75), Project Location (r=0.77) and CP Challenges (r=0.78) questionnaires. Six&#13;
sessions of focus group discussion were conducted with four CDA executive per LGA, while&#13;
12 Community Development Inspectors (CDIs) were interviewed. Quantitative data were&#13;
analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson‘sproduct moment correlation and multiple&#13;
regression at 0.05 level of significance, while qualitative data were content-analysed.&#13;
The respondents‘ mean age was 43.56±3.20 years and 56.0% were male. The CDAs‘ meetings&#13;
(69.4%), community meetings (66.7%), landlord associations (56.9%), town crier (56.9%) and&#13;
religious organisations (55.6%) were major platforms for citizens‘ mobilisation. Leadership&#13;
style ( ̅=3.75), socio-economic status ( ̅=3.07), educational background ( ̅=2.85), Genderrelated Cultural Issues ( ̅=3.11), attitude to CDPs ( ̅=2.79), projects location ( ̅=3.19) and CP&#13;
in community development ( ̅=3.29) were high against the 2.50 threshold. Leadership style&#13;
(r=0.19), projects location (r=0.15) and socio-economic status (r=0.10) had the positive&#13;
significant relationships with CDPs, while citizens‘ attitude (r=-0.01) had a negative&#13;
significant relationship. There was a joint contribution of the determinants of CP in CDPs (F(6;&#13;
920)=8.63; Adj R2=0.05), accounting for 5.0% of its variance. Leadership style (β=0.15),&#13;
project location (β=0.12) and attitude to CDPs (β=0.11) relatively contributed to CP. About&#13;
51.0% of the respondents complained about the time of meeting, and meeting days which&#13;
often fall on market days, lack of trust on the part of the members of the executive and lack of&#13;
resource for mobilisation hindered CP. The CDIs acceded to the fact that logistics, funds and&#13;
projects‘ site hindered CP.&#13;
Leadership style, projects‘ location and attitude to community development projects&#13;
determined citizens‘ participation in community development projects in Osun State, Nigeria.&#13;
Government at various levels, policy makers and implementers, and community development&#13;
agencies should support citizens‘ optimum participations in community development projects&#13;
using the bottom-top approach.
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2274</guid>
<dc:date>2023-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
